ende

Go back
Blog post

CFC as a key to more efficient and cost-effective high-temperature processes

Reading time: 3 Minute(s)
Date: March 30, 2026
Machine Design

Charge Carrier Systems in Comparison: Why CFC Outperforms Steel in High-Temperature Applications

In high-temperature processes such as vacuum brazing or hard soldering, material selection plays a critical role in both efficiency and cost-effectiveness. A factor often overlooked: the charge carrier system. This case study demonstrates why carbon fiber reinforced carbon (CFC) is not only a technical but also a financial advantage over conventional steel. 

Charge Carrier Systems in Comparison: Why CFC Outperforms Steel in High-Temperature Applications

Process Setup: Brazing at 1,200 °C

The comparison is based on a brazing process at 1,200 °C under high vacuum conditions, with three production cycles per day. 

Each cycle runs for eight hours: 

  • Two hours heating 
  • 1.5 hours dwell time 
  • 4.5 hours cooling 

This results in 750 furnace cycles per year – a typical load in industrial production environments. 

 Temperature profile diagram of a brazing process with heating, brazing, and cooling phases over time

Technical Comparison: Steel vs. CFC

Two charge carrier designs with six levels are compared: 

Feature 

Steel System 

CFC System 

Weight 

125 kg 

28 kg 

Specific Heat Capacity 

0.50 kJ/(kg·K) 

0.71 kJ/(kg·K) 

Construction 

Bolted frame, U-beams 

Modular base frame with integrated slats 

Service Life 

~1.5 years 

> 2.4 years (depending on use) 

Initial Investment 

€7,500 

€18,000 

The CFC system is 97 kg lighter – a decisive advantage in thermal cycling and handling. 

Energy Consumption: CFC Requires Significantly Less Heat-Up Energy

Lower thermal mass means lower energy demand during furnace heat-up. Calculations show: 

  • Steel: 
    125 kg × 0.50 kJ/(kg·K) × 1,180 K = 20.5 kWh 

  • CFC: 
    28 kg × 0.71 kJ/(kg·K) × 1,180 K = 6.52 kWh 

That’s an energy saving of ~14 kWh per cycle
Multiplied by 750 cycles per year, this results in: 

  • 10,500 kWh energy savings annually 

  • At €0.20 per kWh: approx. €2,100 per year 

Cost Efficiency: CFC Pays Off Sooner

Despite a higher upfront cost, the CFC carrier proves more economical over time – due to its durability and lower energy consumption. 

Analysis 

Steel (3 years) 

CFC 

Replacement Cost 

2 × €7,500 = €15,000 

1 × €18,000 

Energy Savings 

– 

−€4,200 

Effective Total Cost 

€15,000 

€13,800 

Payback period including energy savings: approx. 1.88 years 

Additional Benefits in Daily Use

CFC carriers offer further advantages in day-to-day production: 

  • Shorter cycle times thanks to faster heating and cooling 
  • Higher equipment availability 
  • Easier handling due to lower weight 
  • Reduced downtime thanks to longer service life 
  • Excellent thermal stability even above 1,000 °C 

Conclusion: Technically Superior, Economically Smart

CFC charge carriers clearly outperform steel – especially in high-temperature processes with frequent furnace use. For manufacturers aiming to reduce energy costs and increase productivity, CFC is a strategic investment with rapid return. 

Get expert advice on CFC fixtures and high-temperature applications

Are you looking to improve the efficiency of your high-temperature processes or sustainably reduce operating costs? Our experts support you in selecting and designing CFC fixtures – from initial analysis to integration into existing heat treatment processes. Discover the benefits of CFC or get in touch with our team directly.

Interested in more information?
Here you will find all relevant brochures, technical documents, and product information on CFC solutions for high-temperature and heat treatment processes.

Subscribe now and never miss a thing!

Subscribe now